Key Findings
Null Average Effects Mask Important Heterogeneity
While Credit Builder Loans (CBLs) show null average effects on credit scores, significant heterogeneity exists based on baseline installment borrowing activity.
CBL Impact Varies by Prior Credit Status
Consumers with less installment activity at baseline see positive effects, while those with more existing installment debt experience negative outcomes.
Strong Positive Selection Effects
CBL take-up provides valuable market signals - those who choose CBLs show improved creditworthiness independent of the CBL itself.
CBL Take-up Rates by Study Arm
- CBL Arm had 30% take-up rate within 18 months
- Extra Step Arm had only 12% take-up rate
- Financial education requirement significantly reduced take-up
Credit Score Treatment Effects by Baseline Installment Activity
- Bottom tercile sees +15 point increase in credit score
- Top tercile experiences -17 point decrease
- Treatment effects diverge significantly based on prior installment credit activity
Delinquency Rates on CBLs
- 40% of CBL users had at least one payment 30+ days late
- High delinquency rates suggest CBLs can backfire for some borrowers
- Payment difficulties particularly pronounced for those with existing installment debt
Contribution and Implications
- CBL providers should consider screening based on existing installment debt levels
- Credit bureaus could improve market efficiency by reporting CBLs as a distinct category
- Product-linked financial education requirements may be counterproductive for take-up
- Results highlight importance of considering heterogeneous effects in credit-building product design
Data Sources
- Take-up rates derived from Table 3 Panel A showing first-stage effects
- Credit score treatment effects based on Table 5 showing heterogeneous effects by baseline installment activity
- Delinquency data from Figure 2 sample construction and CBL payment performance