Key Findings
Police Misconduct Reduction
Using machine learning to screen police officers could reduce shootings by 4.81% compared to traditional hiring methods
Teacher Performance Impact
ML-based teacher selection improved student test scores by 0.0167σ in Math and 0.0111σ in ELA compared to current systems
Cost Effectiveness
ML-based teacher selection is 2-3 times more cost-effective than reducing class sizes by one-third
Impact on Police Misconduct Rates
- ML-based selection reduced police shootings by 4.81%
- Current police system selection showed increased shootings by 1.92%
- ML showed improvements across all misconduct categories
Impact on Student Test Scores
- ML selection showed greater improvements in both Math and ELA scores
- Largest gain was in Math with 0.0167σ improvement
- Benefits apply across entire student population
Cost-Effectiveness Comparison
- ML teacher selection is 3x more cost-effective than class size reduction
- Implementation requires only 6% increase in teacher wages
- Provides broader systemic benefits compared to class size intervention
Contribution and Implications
- Demonstrates significant potential for ML in improving public sector hiring decisions
- Provides empirical evidence for cost-effective alternatives to traditional reform approaches
- Highlights importance of using ML tools to inform specific, concrete decisions rather than general predictions
Data Sources
- Police misconduct chart based on data from Figure 1 showing changes in police misconduct rates
- Student test score improvements based on data reported in text showing gains in Math (0.0167σ) and ELA (0.0111σ)
- Cost-effectiveness comparison derived from authors' calculations comparing ML implementation to Tennessee STAR experiment results