Please rotate your device to landscape mode to view the charts.

Key Findings

Police Misconduct Reduction

Using machine learning to screen police officers could reduce shootings by 4.81% compared to traditional hiring methods

Teacher Performance Impact

ML-based teacher selection improved student test scores by 0.0167σ in Math and 0.0111σ in ELA compared to current systems

Cost Effectiveness

ML-based teacher selection is 2-3 times more cost-effective than reducing class sizes by one-third

Impact on Police Misconduct Rates

  • ML-based selection reduced police shootings by 4.81%
  • Current police system selection showed increased shootings by 1.92%
  • ML showed improvements across all misconduct categories

Impact on Student Test Scores

  • ML selection showed greater improvements in both Math and ELA scores
  • Largest gain was in Math with 0.0167σ improvement
  • Benefits apply across entire student population

Cost-Effectiveness Comparison

  • ML teacher selection is 3x more cost-effective than class size reduction
  • Implementation requires only 6% increase in teacher wages
  • Provides broader systemic benefits compared to class size intervention

Contribution and Implications

  • Demonstrates significant potential for ML in improving public sector hiring decisions
  • Provides empirical evidence for cost-effective alternatives to traditional reform approaches
  • Highlights importance of using ML tools to inform specific, concrete decisions rather than general predictions

Data Sources

  • Police misconduct chart based on data from Figure 1 showing changes in police misconduct rates
  • Student test score improvements based on data reported in text showing gains in Math (0.0167σ) and ELA (0.0111σ)
  • Cost-effectiveness comparison derived from authors' calculations comparing ML implementation to Tennessee STAR experiment results