Please rotate your device to landscape mode to view the charts.

Key Findings

Discovery of Novel Facial Features

The algorithm discovered two previously unknown facial features affecting judge detention decisions: how well-groomed defendants appear and how "heavy-faced" they look

Significant Role of Appearance

The defendant's facial appearance alone accounts for 44.6% of the predictable variation in judge detention decisions

Impact on Detention Rates

Well-groomed and heavy-faced features each reduce detention probability by 2-3 percentage points, comparable to the effect of violent vs non-violent crime charges (4.8 points)

Predictive Power of Facial Features

  • The algorithm's total predictive power (R² = 0.11) substantially exceeds known features alone
  • Facial features account for significant portion of predictive power
  • Novel features (well-groomed and heavy-faced) provide additional explanatory power

Impact on Detention Probability

  • Violent crime charge increases detention probability by 4.8 percentage points
  • Being well-groomed reduces detention probability by 2.0 percentage points
  • Having a heavy face reduces detention probability by 2.8 percentage points

Human vs Algorithm Prediction Accuracy

  • Humans start near random chance (51.4% accuracy)
  • With training, humans learn to identify relevant facial features
  • Accuracy improves to 67% after viewing multiple image pairs

Contribution and Implications

  • Introduces a novel semi-automated procedure for generating testable hypotheses about human behavior using machine learning
  • Demonstrates how algorithms can discover patterns that humans (including domain experts) may miss
  • Provides a framework for using high-dimensional data (images, text, time series) to generate interpretable insights
  • Has implications for understanding and potentially addressing biases in judicial decision-making

Data Sources

  • Predictive power chart based on R² values from Tables III and VI
  • Detention probability impacts based on coefficient estimates from Tables IV and VI
  • Human accuracy progression based on experimental results described in Section V.D