Key Findings
Market Power & Pricing
Field experiment reveals significant unexercised market power - optimal uniform pricing increases profits by 55% compared to status quo $99 price
Personalized Pricing Benefits
Personalized pricing increases firm profits by 19% compared to optimal uniform pricing, and by 86% compared to status quo pricing
Consumer Welfare Impact
While total consumer surplus declines 23% under personalization, over 60% of consumers benefit from lower prices, and welfare improves under inequality-averse metrics
Revenue Impact of Different Price Points
- Monthly revenues per customer increase significantly with higher prices
- Revenue peaks at $399 monthly price point
- Status quo $99 price point leaves substantial money on the table
Conversion Rates Across Price Points
- Conversion rates decline gradually as prices increase
- Even at $399, 11% of customers still convert
- Price elasticity is lower than expected, supporting higher optimal prices
Consumer Welfare Under Different Pricing Schemes
- Personalized pricing reduces total consumer surplus by 23% vs uniform pricing
- However, 63% of consumers receive lower prices under personalization
- Inequality-averse welfare metrics show positive impact from personalization
Contribution and Implications
- First empirical documentation of scalable personalized pricing implementation and welfare effects
- Demonstrates that personalized pricing can benefit both firms and many consumers
- Suggests data privacy regulations should carefully consider welfare implications rather than treating personalized pricing as universally harmful
- Provides framework for analyzing distributional effects of price discrimination
Data Sources
- Revenue Chart: Constructed using data from Table 7 showing realized revenues per customer across price points
- Conversion Chart: Based on Table 5 acquisition rate data from September 2015 experiment
- Welfare Chart: Derived from Table 8(a) showing consumer welfare changes under different inequality aversion parameters