Please rotate your device to landscape mode to view the charts.

Key Findings

Digital Footprint Matches Credit Bureau Scores

Simple digital footprint variables have similar predictive power (AUC 69.6%) compared to credit bureau scores (AUC 68.3%) for predicting defaults

Complementary Information Sources

Digital footprints complement rather than substitute credit bureau information, with combined AUC of 73.6%

Reduced Default Rates

Implementation of digital footprint screening led to 50% reduction in default rates while maintaining credit access

Predictive Power Comparison

  • Digital footprint alone achieves slightly better predictive power than credit bureau scores
  • Combining both methods provides significant improvement in predictive accuracy
  • Based on analysis of 254,819 customers with credit bureau scores

Default Rates by Digital Profile

  • Mobile users show highest default rates at 2.14%
  • Desktop users demonstrate lowest risk with 0.74% default rate
  • Android users (1.79%) show higher default rates than iOS users (1.07%)

Impact on Default Rates After Implementation

  • Default rates dropped by over 50% after implementing digital footprint screening
  • Improvement seen across both scoring methods
  • Maintained similar levels of credit access while reducing defaults

Contribution and Implications

  • Demonstrates digital footprints as powerful alternative credit assessment tools
  • Potential to expand financial inclusion for 2 billion unbanked adults worldwide
  • Provides lenders with easily accessible, cost-effective screening method
  • Highlights importance of digital behavior in financial assessment

Data Sources

  • AUC comparison chart based on Table 4 regression results
  • Default rates by device type visualization derived from Table 2
  • Implementation impact analysis based on Table 9 data
  • Study analyzed 270,399 purchases from German E-commerce company between October 2015-December 2016