Key Findings
Terrorism Financing Impact
Higher terrorism financing in Sunni-majority cities during Ramadan leads to 0.4% higher probability of attacks and 2% more terror incidents when silver prices are high
Capital Intensive Attacks
Increased funding primarily drives capital intensive attacks (bombings, armed assaults) rather than non-capital intensive incidents
Cash & Recruitment Effects
Cities with more cash-based charities show 3-6x larger terrorism effects, with attacks increasing significantly when both financing and recruitment are high
Attack Patterns During Ramadan
- Probability of attack increases by 0.24% in Sunni-majority cities during Ramadan
- Number of attacks increases by 1.12% during this period
- Casualty numbers rise by 0.87% on average
Capital vs Non-Capital Intensive Attacks
- Capital intensive attacks show 0.17% higher probability during financing periods
- Non-capital intensive attacks only increase by 0.06%
- Demonstrates clear preference for capital intensive operations when funding increases
Cash-Based Charity Impact
- Areas with high cash-based charities show 1.47% higher attack probability
- Number of attacks increases by 6.61% in these regions
- Demonstrates amplification effect of cash-based charitable operations
Contribution and Implications
- First empirical evidence linking terrorism financing to attack patterns through quasi-experimental variation
- Demonstrates importance of financial frictions in constraining terrorist operations
- Highlights need for oversight of charitable organizations and cash-based transactions
- Supports value of financial counterterrorism strategies
Data Sources
- Attack patterns visualization based on Table III coefficients showing baseline effects during Ramadan
- Capital vs non-capital intensive comparison drawn from Table IV showing differential effects by attack type
- Cash charity impact visualization constructed using coefficients from Table V showing interaction effects with charity characteristics