Key Findings
Platform Design Impact
Price-directed prominence (PDP) and Dynamic PDP policies can effectively lower prices and increase competition between sellers using pricing algorithms, with Dynamic PDP showing stronger beneficial effects
Algorithm Response
Q-learning algorithms respond to platform design interventions by adjusting pricing strategies, with up to 19.1% price reduction under Dynamic PDP compared to no intervention
Consumer Benefits
Dynamic PDP increases consumer surplus by up to 27.2% and total output by 3.9% when optimally implemented, while maintaining platform profitability
Impact of Platform Design Policies
- Dynamic PDP achieves larger price reductions (-19.1%) compared to regular PDP (-7.4%)
- Consumer surplus increases significantly (27.2%) under Dynamic PDP while decreasing (-6.4%) under regular PDP
- Total output improves under Dynamic PDP (3.9%) but declines under regular PDP (-4.5%)
Algorithm Learning Patterns
- Regular PDP significantly reduces constant price outcomes (6.0%) compared to no intervention (74.2%)
- Dynamic PDP maintains slightly higher constant price outcomes (14.7%)
- Smarter AI shows highest tendency toward constant pricing (86.3%)
Revenue Impact Under Different Policies
- All policies lead to revenue reductions with increased platform intervention (γ)
- Smarter AI shows largest revenue impact (-19.5% at γ = 1.0)
- PDP has smallest revenue impact (-12.6% at γ = 1.0)
Contribution and Implications
- Demonstrates feasibility of platform design to promote competition even with algorithmic pricing
- Provides practical policy framework for platforms to balance consumer welfare and profitability
- Shows importance of dynamic, state-dependent policies in managing algorithmic competition
Data Sources
- Policy Impact Chart: Based on Tables I and III showing percentage changes in market outcomes under different policies
- Algorithm Learning Chart: Constructed from Table II showing pricing and profit patterns across different interventions
- Revenue Impact Chart: Derived from Table IV showing performance under revenue sharing arrangements